IBAC logo
International Bible Advocacy Centre
English|Français|Español

Affirming the place of the Bible in today’s world

  • Home
  • What is the Bible?
  • Our Work
    • About us
    • Who we are
    • What we do
    • Politics
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Media
    • Global Advocacy Exchange
  • Research
  • News & Blog
    • Engaging digital natives with the Bible
    • Give Us Peace – But Not Yet
    • Faith in ‘the people’? How a biblical vision can renew democracy
    • Bible advocacy in the global context
    • The Glory of the Smile: A Biblical Perspective
    • Story-telling as a tool of advocacy
    • Icons, Identities, and Christian faith
    • No note, no comment? The genesis and future of Bible advocacy
    • The future of Bible advocacy in the UBS fellowship
    • ISIS criticised in Westminster debate
    • Boundless creativity for Bible advocacy
    • Is the Bible a bridge or a barrier to democracy?
    • Colours of the Bible
    • That Man: Bringing the story to life for new audiences in Costa Rica
    • Faith at work: equipping the next generation in Romania
    • Bible Exhibition in the European Parliament prompts Bible distribution
    • The role of the Bible in combating corruption: the case of Malawi
    • Does the Bible speak for itself?
    • Finding wholeness, restoring the soul: Bible advocacy through living arts
    • The Bible and culture: how should we read?
    • A look back at IBAC in 2015
    • Democracy, Conflict & the Bible - now on sale
    • The book of a minority or the book for society?
    • Bible museum as an advocacy tool: the experience of Pakistan
    • Planting hope in the wilderness: Reflections on Asian journeys’ Green Desert project
    • Leadership crisis - The bane of Africans' woes
    • Bible mission and Bible advocacy: a Balkan perspective
    • Reimagining Bible Advocacy in globalised youth cultures
    • Advocating for the Bible in sports
    • Four reasons why secularisation is good for international Bible advocacy
    • What does the Bible say about migration?
    • How to do effective Bible advocacy in academia
    • How to profile the Bible in inter-religious dialogue
    • On judging and the Bible
    • Has the Bible got the X Factor?
    • 5 things to help take Bible advocacy to the next level
    • Pitching the Bible in the world of young film-makers
    • Church and State: biblical view on their relationship
    • A Christian view of the Internet and new media
    • ‘Theistic Evolution’: is it biblical?
    • 6 ways the Bible is changing the conversation among Africa’s leaders
    • Leading civic engagement for biblical transformation
    • 5 biblical entrepreneurship principles to teach your kids
    • Imagining the Bible in Donald Trump's world
    • Speaking sculptures
    • Bible advocacy as a tool of reshaping young minds in Argentina
    • 7 reasons why the marketplace is a great place for Christians
    • Trauma, transformation and the Bible
    • Get ready for ABLI 2016
    • Conversation with Hon. Paul Yoane Bonju: Part One
    • Conversation with Hon. Paul Yoane Bonju: part two
    • Ending religion won’t end the conflict
    • Islam and the Western Christianity: facing conflict for mutual gain?
    • Jesus teaches us to love even Donald Trump
    • Interview with Honourable Anne Linno
    • Christianity ‘in line with the Chinese Dream’ conference told
    • Christian values at heart of Chinese academic seminar
    • Why work in the arts? Bible advocacy and the imagination
    • Faithful compromise: The lost art of brokered effectiveness in our public life
    • Eating as discipleship
    • How to survive the apocalypse: zombies, Cylons, faith and politics at the end of the world
    • Bible advocacy and secularism today: the role of IBAC
    • Event: Faith and Citizenship: A divided allegiance?
    • What Does it Mean to be Human? Blade Runner, Babylon, and the Bible
    • Church well-placed to help bring peace to Africa, says Lord Boateng
    • East - West Church Dialogue Resource Publication
    • “Open Sesame” – Integrity and Courage in Christian-Muslim Encounter
    • Conference aims to support Christian communities under pressure in the Middle East
    • Bible Society conference feels the pain of Middle East church
  • Contact us
Our website uses cookies to improve your online experience. Accept | Find out more
No note, no comment? The genesis and future of Bible advocacy
< Back

James Catford is Bible Society's Group Chief Executive. He has a background in commercial book publishing having been publishing director at both HodderHeadline and HarperCollins.

Set beside a beautiful lake in North Wales, some have called Mary Jones World 'the spiritual home of Bible Societies'. It tells the story of how, in the year 1800, a teenage girl walked a long day's journey, most likely barefoot, to buy a Bible in her own heart language of Welsh.

Inspired by her example, most of the Bibles in most of the world have been produced by Bible Societies that form the United Bible Societies. Little, however, is known about the passion behind the people who started this great movement and what their hope was for the future.

The young Mary Jones received her Bible from an independent church minister in the town of Bala. His name was Thomas Charles and he is celebrated today for his pioneering contribution to open-access education across Wales. It was Charles who with the backing of others, set up the original British and Foreign Bible Society in London in 1804.

Amongst the supporters of the new Bible movement was William Wilberforce. A Member of Parliament and practicing Anglican (Episcopalian), Wilberforce is most famous for the abolition of slavery in the British Empire. Other social activists such as the prison reformer Elizabeth Fry joined the visionary call to take the Bible to the world.

Such was their significance in our story that BFBS has meeting rooms named after both Charles and Wilberforce, along with Lord Shaftesbury, another radical social reformer of his day.

As the story of Bible Societies has been told down the years, two noticeable features stand out. One is that our founders came from a whole variety of Christian denominations and the other is that the object of BFBS was the "wider circulation or use of the Bible” and “without note or comment". 

To keep out of church disputes and simply share the Bible 'without comment' was highly unusual for those times.

Today we talk about Bible Societies being 'interconfessional' and holding to a 'generous orthodoxy' in faith and conduct.

This is one of the reasons why the 'post-denominational' church in China is willing to work with us.

Interconfessional, generously orthodox and post-denominational - this is our pioneering story. But it is not the whole story and it doesn't do justice to the men and women who created our movement.

In the United Kingdom, the United States and elsewhere, our founders were committed to society every bit as much as they were to the Bible. Indeed, the best way to understand them is to see the Bible in one hand and social change in the other. What's more, the Bible actually inspired the reform of society that they were seeking.

Our founders were not isolationists who withdrew from the public square. Far from it. They were engaged in all kinds of activism from better working conditions to animal welfare. When BFBS appointed a worker for the British Houses of Parliament in 2004 we said that he was our second senior Parliamentary officer. The first, 200 years earlier, was William Wilberforce.

In taking the Bible into the world of media, arts, politics and education, we do so with a strong history behind us. We are translating the Bible into a particular cultural context. To be effective in our work, we have no choice.

So how can we engage the Bible in society without abandoning the governing principle of 'no note and comment'?

First of all, our founders were not suggesting that we cannot say anything about Scripture, only that we can't say anything that's sectarian about it. This means that we don't take a position on controversial issues that divide Christians. We have no mandate for doing so.

(Understood this way, simply publishing the Bible without comment was a statement about the Bible; that it is able to stand on its own two feet. No comment was actually a very profound comment on what the Bible is, and is not.)

However, we do speak in broad terms about issues where Christians are agreed. For example about building a harmonious society, or that 'the Bible is a unique source of essential knowledge about the most important things in life' as Dallas Willard put it.

Our experience is that it is possible to advocate for the Bible without breaching our original mandate.

In looking forward to the future we are eager to find new and innovative ways to do this. Not to speak for the Bible or on behalf of the church, but to engage people with the Bible and let it speak for itself.

We strive we do this with wisdom and grace. What will work in one context may not work in another. But when it comes to the big issues of our day, we want to join with others to demonstrate that the Bible is part of the answer, not part of the problem.

We want to demonstrate that the Bible has value culturally, socially and spiritually. In appropriate ways it deserves to sit on the top table of world affairs.

This is how we honour the genesis of our past while also looking to the future of our work and mission under God.

Published: 02/11/2015

Although IBAC exists to foster conversations on Bible advocacy-related issues, the views or opinions represented in this blog are solely those of the author

Bible Society
Copyright
Privacy policy
Cookie Policy
Bible Society, Stonehill Green, Westlea, Swindon, SN5 7DG.
Charity reg number: 232759